|
Click here for a map
showing the access connections
Summary presentation of "Public
support, the options and the access connections"
The detail regarding the optimal
design lanes widths
What is the forecast
use?
Does the walkway/cycleway have the support of the
local councils?
ARC's Regional Land Transport Committee (Feb 20, 2008):
That the Regional Land Transport Committee support
the agreement by Transit, the Auckland Regional Council, the Auckland
Regional Transport Authority, the North Shore City Council and the
Auckland City Council to undertake a joint study into the options for
walking and cycling across the Waitemata Harbour, including connections
to local networks and giving specific
consideration to the Cycle Action Auckland “optimum”
proposal.
ARC's Transport and Urban Development Committee (Dec 5, 2007)
"That the Committee support provision for
cycling and pedestrians on the
Auckland
Harbour
Bridge
in conjunction with the strengthening work on the clip ons."
North Shore City Council (Dec 4, 2007)
"That this Council supports the appropriate
modifications to the Auckland Harbour Bridge to support a cycleway and
walkway and the costs and feasibility of cycleway/walkway links to the
Harbour Bridge be investigated and a report be brought back to this
Committee."
Auckland City Council's Transport Committee (Dec 13, 2007):
"That the Chairman of Transport Committee write to Transit New
Zealand advocating for a walkway and cycleway across the Auckland
Harbour Bridge."
From the minutes of Te Araroa Trust’s February
2008 meeting:
Te
Araroa Trust supports Cycle Action
Auckland
’s plan for cycling and pedestrian lanes on the
Auckland
Harbour
Bridge
. When these lanes are in place they will provide an
alternative route which the trust would vigorously promote as part of
its New Zealand-long walkway. Cycle Action
Auckland
’s plan is consistent with Te Araroa Trust’s philosophy of promoting
walking.
Can it be done?
Yes – Transit has commissioned a feasibility study
which was completed in July 2006 that confirmed a walkway and cycleway
can be added to the clip-on’s by providing the walkway on the outside
of the east side and a cycleway on the outside of the west side.
In 2007, as part of the project to strengthen the
clip-on’s starting in mid 2008, the final design and costing of a
walkway / cycleway was completed.
What is the cost?
There are currently two options on the table – one
requires widening the existing clip-on’s and the use of elevators at
the northern end. It is costed at $35 to $40 million.
The second option is estimated to cost $5 million and
fits within the existing clip-on’s, as
detailed here and provides a 2.4m walkway / cycleway (one each side
along the outside edge of the bridge).
Where will the funding come from?
Transit has annual budget for walking and cycling
projects. Last year Transit had $3 million allocated to walking and
cycling - only $1m of this money was spent!
Further funding is available from the Auckland Region’s
“R” funding which is an existing fuel tax of 5c/litre. It has funds
of allocated to cycle and walking which could be used to fund this
project.
Is this project really a priority for Auckland?
Yes, absolutely. Our car dominated transport system is
crippling Auckland's economy, which is well known to be
under-performing. Aucklanders want a more liveable city which will
attract high calibre work force and businesses. Currently Auckland is
one of the worst cities to walk in, unsafe for cycling and has very poor
public transport.
It is a vital connection in the region’s cycling
network published by ARTA. Currently 165,000 vehicles per day use the
bridge, the walkway / cycleway will provide a quick and convenient
alternative means of crossing the
harbour.
The Harbour Bridge is the most iconic structure in the
region, yet it says ‘motor vehicles only!’ This project is an
important flagship that demonstrates Auckland is serious about:
-
moving away from its unsustainable car dominated
approach to transport
-
doing something about reducing CO2 emmisions
-
reducing our exposure to ever rising oil prices
-
creating a more enjoyable city to live in.
Will the walkway /cycleway adversely affect the traffic
on the bridge?
No, there is no reduction in traffic lanes. Views for
motorists will not be affected. In fact, given the potential number of
cycling and walking trips at 10,000 per day, motorists can expect to a
reduction in motor vehicle traffic on the bridge by 3 to 4%
How many people will use it?
Based on the usage of the Sydney Harbour Bridge (which
is slightly longer), it is forecast that a potential 5,000 cyclists and
walkers would use the Auckland Harbour Bridge each day in each
direction, representing 2 to 3% of the traffic over the bridge. These
figures will grow as oil prices rise and climate change taxes take
effect.
Isn’t the Auckland Harbour Bridge too steep to cycle
up?
No, the gradient on the bridge is 5% - easy for anyone
of reasonable fitness on a bike with gears.
How will Aucklanders access either end of the Bridge?
The connections to the Harbour Bridge are quite straight
forward. On the Auckland City side there is good access to Westhaven,
which connects to Ponsonby and the tank farm development providing
direct walking and cycling access to Auckland’s CBD.
On the Northcote Point side of the bridge, Transit have
designed and costed options for an elevator or ramps to connect to
Princes St. North Shore City Council has mapped out potential routes for
shared paths to provide connections to Takapuna and beyond.
How can we ensure people’s security and safety?
Transit already monitors the Auckland Harbour Bridge
with camera’s from their Control Centre just north of the Bridge. The
walkway / cycleway would have appropriate barriers from the cars traffic
and wind. If necessary, access to the walk way and cycle way could be
closed in severe weather conditions.
Why should we provide access to cyclists who don’t pay
fuel tax and vehicle registration fees?
Most people who cycle also own cars (98% of Cycle Action
Auckland members also own cars) so most cyclists do in fact pay vehicle
registration and fuel tax when they do choose to drive. For every
Aucklander choosing to cycle, there is one less car creating congestion,
carbon and parking problems.
But isn’t there another harbour crossing to be built
in the future, which could provide for cyclists and pedestrians?
If a new bridge is decided for the next crossing, it
will take a minimum of 15 years to design, consent and build. We don’t
believe Aucklanders should have to wait that long. It is highly likely
that the next harbour crossing will be a tunnel (as happened in Sydney),
given the requirement to provide rapid public transport from Britomart
to North Shore. This means the existing Harbour Bridge will need to be
upgraded to provide for cyclists or pedestrians eventually - so why
wait?
|